Mocks & Stubs & Exceptions in Ruby

Josh Thompson
7 min readMay 26, 2018

--

Some of my recent work at Wombat has been around improving error handling and logging.

We had some tasks that, if they failed to execute correctly, were supposed to raise exceptions, log themselves, and re-queue, but they were not.

The class in which I was working managed in large part API calls to external services, services that our team has no control over. Sometimes the services work great, sometimes they don’t. The tests for this class made heavy use of mocks, stubs, and the VCR gem.

This post was originally going to be about error handling, but then I realized I was getting a bit crossed up just by the mocks and stubs, so I took a quick detour into the topic, in order to build out a mental model of what was going on.

As I often do, I spun up a bare-bones implementation of all of the required pieces, to see how everything was playing together. One guide I found was excellent, but the sample app was a bit over-kill. I didn’t want a whole new rails app — I just wanted a class and test file.

note: This isn’t a tutorial, per se, but it’s just two files and you can easily copy-paste the code into an editor and run the tests. I’ll link to specific commits in a github repo throughout. Clone it down, check out the commit, poke around.

This project took me through:

  • stubbing
  • mocking
  • raising exceptions
  • rescuing exceptions
  • testing all of the above

What are mocks and stubs?

I’ll admit — the “standard definition” of mocks and stubs didn’t mean much to me. Quite a few definitions I found referenced “the Fowler article” which, while interesting, doesn’t quite move me forward on testing Rails app today.

From StackOverflow

  • mocks are objects that have a similar interface as something else
  • stubs are fake methods and return a specific answer

So, of course, I needed to see them function ‘in the wild’.

Eliminate dependencies on other classes in testing

I decided to make up this service and connection class.

Imagine I want to connect to a few different third-party services. I’ll have a connection class into which I can pass a third-party service “object”, and it should “connect”.

I will assume I can call third_party_service.status and get back 200, 404, 504, etc.

I will also assume that sometimes my own service will not function correctly, and so my_service.status can also be any particular status code, like 200, 404, 504, etc.

I’d like to be able to test that I can raise specific errors if either connection.status or third_party_service.status is not 2xx.

Here’s my sample Connection class, where I’ve hard-coded the 200 status:

class Connection

attr_reader :status_code

def initialize
@status_code = get_service_status
end

def get_service_status
200
end

def connect_to_external_service(srvc)
return srvc.status_code
end

end

And here’s the test that shows all is groovy:

class ConnectionTest < Minitest::Test

def test_initializes_with_response_code
c = Connection.new
assert_equal 200, c.status_code
end

end

Now, lets say I’ve got this third party service. Since I’m testing this all locally, and I want to square away mocking and stubbing anyway, I’m getting real fancy and I’m putting this in the same file as my Connection class:

class Connection

attr_reader :status_code

def initialize
@status_code = get_service_status
end

def get_service_status
200
end


def connect_to_external_service(srvc)
return srvc.status_code
end

end

# this is my third-party class that `Connection` might have dependencies upon
class Service
attr_reader :status_code

def initialize
@status_code = get_service_status
# status_code would be 200, 504, 404, etc
end

def get_service_status
# do complicated stuff here to get status code
# return a status code
200
end
end

Inside my test, when I call Connection.new.connect_to_external_service(), I need to pass in a service object, like so:

srvc = Service.new
conn = Connection.new

conn.connect_to_external_service(srvc)

And I’m off to the races. This is where I want to start raising exceptions if either class returns errors, and where stubbing and mocking comes to be very valuable.

So, this test would pass:

class ConnectionTest < Minitest::Test

def test_connection_default_status_code_is_200
c = Connection.new
assert_equal 200, c.status_code
end

def test_external_service_default_status_code_is_200
conn = Connection.new
srvc = Service.new

assert_equal 200, conn.connect_to_external_service(srvc)
end
end

But I want to make srvc.status_code be something besides 200.

Lets figure out how to make srvc.status_code be 404, and maybe in the process remove the dependency upon the Service class all together.

Stubbing the service object to force errors

Current github commit

Right now, I want to run a test like this:

def test_raises_error_when_service_returns_4xx_no_mocks
srvc = Service.new
srvc.status_code = 404
conn = Connection.new

assert_raises Connection::ServiceNotFound do
conn.connect_to_external_service(srvc)
end
end

This won’t work because I don’t have an attr_writer or attr_accessor for the Service instance variable of status_code

This is the error I get when I run the test:

1) Error:
ConnectionTest#test_raises_error_when_service_returns_4xx_no_mocks:
NoMethodError: undefined method `status_code=' for #<Service:0x00007f81ce3c34d8 @status_code=200>

And this makes sense, right? I cannot assume ownership of the third party service.

Here’s how I can stub out the method as I want it, using mocha’s tooling for stubbing:

gem install mocha, and include the following front-matter in the test file:

require './lib/connection'
require 'minitest/autorun'
require 'mocha/minitest'

class ConnectionTest < Minitest::Test

def test_raise_error_when_service_returns_4xx_using_stubs
serv = Service.new
# instantiating a new Service object. if I call
# serv.status_code, it would return 200
Service.any_instance.stubs(:status_code).returns(404)
# override the method to always return 404
conn = Connection.new

assert_raises Connection::ServiceNotFound do
conn.connect_to_external_service(serv)
end
end

The magic is Service.any_instance.stubs(:status_code).returns(404)

Stubbing modifies an existing object to coerce it into giving a certain output.

This is cool, but nothing revelatory to me. I’ve been working with stubs for a while. What finally clicked for me was the difference between mocks and stubs.

The above test still requires access to a Service class. If Service doesn’t exist, or requires any setup that I didn’t pass it, I’m out of luck and will need to do even more test setup.

Enter mocks.

Mocking the service object

I want to remove all dependencies on Service. I want to create a service object in my test, assign it variables, and use them in my Connection class, all without Connection knowing anything about Service, or indeed, Service knowing anything about itself.

We’ve got Connection under test here, remember. Not Service

Here’s the commit for the following code: 6b7014c

I’ll make srvc a stub, which I can now make it do anything I want:

def test_rais_error_when_service_returns_4xx_using_mocks
conn = Connection.new
srvc = stub("srvc is now a stub.")
# srvc.class == Mocha::Mock

srvc.stubs(:status_code).returns(404)

assert_raises Connection::ServiceNotFound do
conn.connect_to_external_service(srvc)
end
end

so I no longer have a Service object. If I call srvc.class on that stubbed object, it’s Mocha::Mock

I then assign it a method of .status_code, and tell it to return 404. Boom. Done.

So, I’m no longer dependent upon the Service model for any of my Connection testing. I’d say thats a win.

Here’s the commit for making full use of mocks

You’ll never not necessarily see the word ‘mock’ in your code, even when using mocks.

I’m not the sharpest tool in the shed, so I do a lot of pattern matching. Articles about stubbing always had the word ‘stub’ being scattered about the code. That made it easy to see when a stub was being used.

Mocks, though, don’t necessarily get called in the code. Traditionally, you could do obj = stub('object'), and get your stubbed object that way. Now (I think this is more recent) you can make it a bit more explicit and call obj = mock('object'), and you’ll be on your way.

Either way, mock() and stub() are interchangeable:

mocked_object = mock('mocked_object')
stubbed_object = stub('stubbed_object')

gives:

> mocked_object
=> #<Mock:mocked_object>
> stubbed_object
=> #<Mock:stubbed_object>

So, if you see foo = mock(), it’s a mocked object, but if you see foo = stub(), it’s also a mocked object.

Exceptions

We’ve covered mocking and stubbing, and are ready to dig into exception raising and handling.

Lets say my third party service goes down (404) or times out (504). I’d like to raise these descriptive errors, and do something with it.

This is the test I could create:

def test_raise_service_timeout_if_service_returns_504
@srv.stubs(:status_code).returns(504)

assert_raises Connection::ServiceTimeOut do
@conn.connect_to_external_service(@srv)
end
end

And I can update my Connection class:

def connect_to_external_service(srvc)
raise ServiceNotFound if srvc.status_code == 404
raise ServiceTimeOut if srvc.status_code == 504
# do other stuff
return srvc.status_code
end

This won’t quite pass — for reasons I’m still exploring, we cannot raise a ServiceTimeOut or ServiceNotFound error unless these classes are included in the class:

.
.
def connect_to_external_service(srvc)
raise ServiceNotFound if srvc.status_code == 404
raise ServiceTimeOut if srvc.status_code == 504
# do other stuff
return srvc.status_code
end

class ServiceNotFound < StandardError; end
class ServiceTimeOut < StandardError; end
end

And these tests pass.

Why do we need ServiceNotFound and ServiceTimeOut to inherit from StandardError, and be included in the class?

ServiceNotFound.ancestors
=> [Connection::ServiceNotFound,
StandardError,
Exception,
Object,
Kernel,
BasicObject]
StandardError.ancestors
=> [StandardError,
Exception,
Object,
Kernel,
BasicObject]

raise is a Kernal method, it seems.

I’m going to leave this here, for now. The whole problem that led to this blog post I am now fully ready to dig into — I wanted to rescue some raised exceptions, and when I did that, the standard assert_raises testing stopped working, because… it seemed the raised error was caught and “squelched” by the rescue, and never bubbled back up to the test.

I’ll write more on that soon.

Misc Resources

This article was originally posted on https://josh.works.

--

--

Josh Thompson
Josh Thompson

Written by Josh Thompson

Software, rock climbing, books. I love to learn. https://josh.works

No responses yet